Thursday, August 29, 2013

Life of Immigrants on Film


Undocument: Exploring the experiences of immigrants through film

Richard Sudan
Deep Breath 300x150 Undocument: Exploring the experiences of immigrants through filmRecently I went to a screening of two short films dealing with the experiences of immigrants, and the challenges and prejudices they often face. The films made for powerful viewing, and provide a sharp contrast to the right-wing propaganda we usually hear levelled at immigrants from politicians, fringe movements like the EDL, and some in the media.
This is worrying, when we consider that over the last few weeks and months we’ve seen a rise in far-right extremism, both at home and also across Europe – with politicians increasingly feeling the need to pander to them to secure votes.
Therefore, in this context, it’s vital that we dispel myths about immigrants, and understand the crucial role they have played and do play in British society, and counter the supposed ‘facts’ and figures often peddled.
The Interpreter and Deep Breath are two pieces which are part of Undocument, a feature made up of four short films exploring the effects of immigration on those living it. They go a long way in achieving this. The films humanize the central characters – themselves dealing with the many challenges typically faced in a strange land – by reflecting their humanity rather than stigmatizing them.
The Interpreter follows the life of an interpreter working in a London immigration court, who finds himself becoming increasingly involved with a family at the mercy of a system which seems loaded with contempt for them. The indifferent bureaucracy of the world in which Ramzi works is at odds with his principles as a human being. Ramzi’s need to safeguard his livelihood conflicts with his instincts to help the family, leading him to an unavoidable crossroad.
Deep Breath written by Amin Bakhshian, tells the story of a mother and eight-year-old son who are forced to live in awful conditions, under the constant threat of an extortionist criminal who holds their fate in his hands. They have no choice but to endure the situation if they are to have any chance of making it to the UK and to have a better life.
The first two films are an achievement in themselves, but this project, like many other great initiatives needs support to complete the other films and to spread awareness of what is an important and complex issue, one that needs more attention, and certainly more consideration than it is usually afforded.
The reality of the conditions and the humanity of the people facing these hardships are often lost in a muddle of statistics, numbers, and cheap propaganda, as recently seen with theoutrageous tweet and campaign organised by the Home Office.
Kyla Simone Bruce, writer and director of The Interpreter explained why she felt it was important to create these films: “After spending time in immigrations courts and speaking with people who were going through this complex and often difficult process, I was very much affected by my experiences.”
“My intention with The Interpreter was to capture the very real emotions felt by the individuals involved. I didn’t have any specific intentions in terms of pushing any one agenda, just to shed light on the situations that people are going through right here, right now. I wanted to stay honest and truthful to the circumstances and characters and to give a more honest reflection of what is really happening, in contrast to the often generalised viewpoint of the mainstream media.”
For more information visit www.undocumentfilm.com
Tagged in: 

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Immigration Reform's Lost Month



Immigration Reform’s Lost Month

Success on the town hall circuit doesn't mean reform advocates will win in Congress


LUCY NICHOLSON/REUTERS
Maria Cervantes, 6, takes part in a 24-hour vigil calling on Congress to pass immigration reform in Los Angeles, June 27, 2013.


From Time Swampland:
August is almost over, with it ends the discussion over which side in the immigration debate enjoyed the upper hand while Congress was in recess. The verdict was nearly unanimous. It was also mistaken.
Proponents of reform, noted the Washington Post, launched an “all-out push,” pressing a comprehensive overhaul of U.S. immigration law at “roundtables and rallies, sit-ins and voter registration drives, as well as expensive radio and television ads.” Meanwhile, opponents ”have been mostly absent” from public view, wrote The Atlantic,. “Anti-immigration forces have lain low,” Politicagreed. Liberal blogs gleefully circulatedphotos of Iowa Republican Rep. Steve King, an icon of the anti-reform movement, speaking to a sparse crowd on the first leg of a “Stop Amnesty” tour. Reform advocates have “prevailed” over the summer break, wrote The New Republic, under a headline that read: “Immigration Reform is Having a Good Month.”
But this assessment misses the forest for the trees.
If you measure success by events held and headlines generated, it’s true that the diverse array of groups who support immigration reform trounced a shrinking and disorganized opposition during the August recess. It also doesn’t matter much. An immigration overhaul like the bill that passed the Senate in June already enjoyed broad support among voters, including a majority of Republicans. The continuing success of the outside game does little to change the lack of momentum inside the Capitol.
There is no timetable for legislative action in the House. Republicans have slow-walked the issue into a brief fall legislative session that will be dominated by another round of budget brinkmanship. The crowded calendar is one reason supporters had hoped the deal would be done by now, knowing the chances of success grow slimmer the longer the debate drags on.
Yes, a few dozen conservatives are open to a path to citizenship. But House Republicans have vowed not to take up the Senate bill, and an alternative proposal in the House never materialized. It seems unlikely a House Republican majority that has been content to let the issue languish will abruptly shift course — especially now that Sen. Marco Rubio and Rep. Raul Labrador, two of the Republicans with the credibility to sell an overhaul to their colleagues, have abandoned their roles as pitchmen.
Advocates were cheered by the dearth of organized opposition to reform because the conservative base has won recess battles in the past. In 2007, the grassroots rebelled at a George W. Bush-backed immigration proposal, and the 2009 recess furies foreshadowed the Republican landslide in the 2010 midterms. But grassroots strength is an imperfect portent of legislative success. Take Obamacare, which passed despite the Tea Party outcry at venomous town halls.
As one progressive involved in the immigration-reform push puts it: “Progressives need to be less confident that field and legislative outcomes are linked — a recurring illusion.” Even if immigration reform managed to “survive“ August, it did so only on life support. 



Read more: http://swampland.time.com/2013/08/26/immigration-reforms-lost-month/#ixzz2dH2TUkbB

Saturday, August 10, 2013

99 Year Old Got Green Card


Immigration Direct told this beautiful story of a ninety nine year old woman who got her citizenship.
Iranian Khatoun Khoykani was awarded her green card at the age of 99 after moving to the U.S. 15 years ago, according to the Associated Press. Khoykani was among approximately 3,700 other immigrants who were naturalized during a ceremony in Los Angeles on July 26.
Khoykani was the oldest person this year among the naturalized citizens in L.A. There have only been 27 people older than 100 to become American citizens in the last 50 years, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services told the source.
"I'm shaking because I'm so happy," Khoykani told the AP. "There's no place like this in the entire world."
Khoykani left Iran shortly after the 1979 Islamic Revolution before settling in L.A. in 1998, the AP reported. Her three children left Iran almost 30 years ago for the U.S. and she came here to be with them.
She returned to Iran in 2008 to care for her sick husband and after he passed away in 2009 she had trouble reentering the U.S. Her daughter tried to pick her up and a "lengthy legal process" began. 
According to the AP, the oldest person ever to become a U.S. citizen was a 117-year-old Turkish immigrant named Manik Bokchalian. She took her oath of allegiance in 1997.

Friday, April 26, 2013

Waiver of Adjustment Interviews


NBC Practice Pointer: Waiver of Adjustment Interviews for Certain Family-Based Petitions

Cite as "AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 13042251 (posted Apr. 22, 2013)" 
On October 2012, USCIS announced that it was transferring certain filings from the four USCIS service centers to either a field office or the National Benefits Center (NBC) in order to balance the workload and processing times. (AILA Doc. No. 12100148.) As part of this workload shift, USCIS transferred interview-waivable family-based Forms I-485 from the California Service Center (CSC) to the NBC.
Under 8 CFR §245.6, USCIS may waive the interview for an applicant for adjustment of status. The NBC’s decision to waive the interview for certain cases is based on standards set at the national level, and include adjustment categories in which there is normally enough evidence to make a decision without an interview. According to minutes from a November 2012 liaison meeting with the NBC and the Adjudicator’s Field Manual (AFM), the following adjustment applications will be considered on a case-by-case basis for a waiver of the interview (AILA Doc. No. 13011447, AFM Chapter 23.2(h).):
  • Unmarried minor children and stepchildren of U.S. citizens (IR7 and CR7) that are accompanied by original or certified copies of supporting documents;
  • Parents of U.S. citizens (IR0) that are accompanied by original or certified copies of supporting documents;
  • K1/K2 entrants— FiancĂ©(e)s of U.S. citizens and children of FiancĂ©(e)s (CF1/CF2);
  • Natives/Citizens of Cuba filing under 11/2/66 Act (also spouses/children of such individuals regardless of their citizenship and place of birth) (CU6/CU7);
  • Unmarried & Under 14 year old children of lawful permanent residents (F27);
  • Cases where the applicant has been interviewed in the course of an investigation or field examination, and the adjudicating examiner determines that further interview of the applicant is unnecessary;
  • Cases in which there is sufficient evidence contained in the record to support a denial of the adjustment of status application.
Please note that the NBC will NOT waive the interview for applicants who file:
  • With Supplement A to Form I-485, Adjustment of Status Under Section 245(i)
  • With an EWI class of admission
  • As part of a family packet; unless every application in the family packet meets the interview waiver criteria.